ORGANIZATIONAL AND PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION OF RATING SYSTEM OF TRAINING QUALITY EVALUATION FOR TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article analyses a number of organizational and pedagogical conditions that ensure operation of the rating system for evaluation of training quality among technical university students. It shows that successful operation of the rating system is possible only if some particular conditions are met. The authors believe that one of these conditions is the readiness of students and lecturers to in rating evaluation of educational activity. As a result of theoretical studies it was found that the concept of “readiness” to some activity can be interpreted in different ways: as the entire personality object, as “purposeful complex of qualities, knowledge, practical skills and abilities, attitudes, and states”, as the “entire inherent property of a personality, as integrated formation of a personality”. Within the framework of this research, the student’s readiness involves awareness of regulatory documents that regulate the student’s activity in rating evaluation conditions; ability to use the necessary software, work with electronic documents, spreadsheets, make presentations and create databases; a great number of testing materials which implies the ability to use testing technique. Another organizational and pedagogical condition is development of benchmark tests aimed at determination of level of student’s training in each subject including controlling complex of tests in each classroom discipline. At present test checking is very popular both in educational and professional diagnostics. The third condition of successful functioning of a rating system is development and application of software packages which make it possible to calculate rating automatically; storage of control testing materials and test results; informational and methodological support. The authors have come to the conclusion that implementation of the organizational and pedagogical conditions described above might contribute to successful functioning of rating evaluation in real-life educational process.

About the authors

Larisa Vasilievna Chuprova

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: lvch67@mail.ru

candidate of pedagogical sciences, assistant Professor of the Department «Chemistry»

Russian Federation

Olga Viktorovna Yershova

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Email: yershova_mgtu@mail.ru

candidate of pedagogical sciences, assistant Professor of the Department «Chemistry»

Russian Federation

Elvira Rinatovna Mullina

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Email: e.mullina@inbox.ru

candidate of technical sciences, assistant Professor of the Department «Chemistry»

Russian Federation

Olga Alekseevna Mishurina

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk

Email: olegro74@mail.ru

candidate of technical sciences, assistant Professor of the Department «Chemistry»

Russian Federation

References

  1. Ershova O.V. Model of rating system for training quality evaluation of students from a technical university. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 324–328.
  2. Chuprova L.V., Ershova O.V., Podionova N.I. Creative development of students in rating system for training quality evaluation. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN, 2012, vol. 14, no. 4-5, pp. 1476–1478.
  3. Chuprova L.V., Ershova O.V. Rating system of education quality evaluation as a factor of students’ creative activity development. Internet-jurnal Naukovedenie, 2013, no. 4, p. 73.
  4. Ojegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazika [Dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Sovetskay enciklopediya publ., 1964, 900 p.
  5. Oganesov V.A. Podgotovka konkurentosposobnogo specialista v usloviyah diversifikacii visshego obrazovaniya. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Training of competitive specialist in diversity of higher education]. Stavropol, 2003, 21 p.
  6. Boritko N.M. V prostranstve vospitatelnoy deyatelnosti [In the field of educational activity]. Volgograd, Peremena publ., 2001, 214 p.
  7. Andreev V.I. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Kazan, Centr innovacionnih tehnologiy publ., 2000, 124 p.
  8. Voronova T.A. Formirovanie u studentov gotovnosti k pedagogicheskomu samoobrazovaniyu v usloviyah universiteta. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Forming of students’ readiness to pedagogical self-education at a university]. Leningrad, 1986, 280 p.
  9. Dyachenko I.I. Optimizaciya upravleniya uchebnim poznaniem. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Optimization of learning management]. Leningrad, 1970, 20 p.
  10. Nain A.Ya. Refleksivnoe upravlenie obrazovatelnim uchrejdeniem: teoreticheskie osnovi [Reflexive management of educational institution: basic foundation]. Shadrinsk, Iset publ., 1999, 256 p.
  11. Abdullina O.A. Obshepedagogicheskaya podgotovka uchitelya v sisteme visshego pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [General pedagogical training of a teacher in higher pedagogical education]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Prosveshenie publ., 1999, 141 p.
  12. Vidt I.E. Obshaya kultura uchitelya kak factor uspeshnosti pedagogicheskoy deyatelnosti. Avtoref. diss. kand. ped. nauk [General culture of a teacher as a factor of success in educational activity]. Ekaterinburg, 1995, 17 p.
  13. Serikov G.N. Teoreticheskie osnovi sistemnogo upravleniya [Theory of system management]. Chelyabinsk, CHIPKRO, 1993, 171 p.
  14. Yakovleva L.V. Formirovaniye gotovnosti budushih uchiteley k pedagogicheskoy refleksii. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Forming of future teachers’ readiness to pedagogical reflection]. Moscow, 1991, 128 p.
  15. Chuprova L.V., Ershova O.V., Mullina E.P., Mishurina O.A. Testing as a controlling method of students’ educational achievements in a technical university. Sovremennie problemi nauki i obrazovaniya, 2014, no. 3, pp. 289.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies