PROBLEMS IN REPRODUCTION OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES IN RUSSIA: POLITICAL IMPERATIVE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers the reproduction of power within the local government bodies, which function as civil society institutions in accordance with the constitutional provisions. The article argues that the process of the reproduction of the local government bodies falls under control of the regional executive bodies and is facilitated by the City Manager – a form of city government borrowed from the American political practice – that is nevertheless regarded in the USA as "not democratic"; by the shortcomings in the electoral legislation affecting the fundamental principles of the elections; by the use of a proportional electoral system that politicizes the local government; by maintaining the economic insufficiency of the local government bodies using strict regulation of the tax system by the federal legislation, forfeiture of their property in the privatization process, and transfer of unfunded authority; and by encouraging the public paternalistic consciousness based on the idea of a supreme suzerain. With the help of the abovementioned methods, the state restrains the civil potential of local government bodies, preserves monocentric political structure, and therefore makes the local government bodies "the weakest link" in the control mechanism. The article points out the lack of opportunity for the citizens to influence the size and structure of the local government bodies due to the fact that these are regulated by the federal state. This fact increases the gap between the local authorities and population, and becomes instrumental in building these institutions of civil society into the “power vertical” structure. The monocentrism of Russian policy leads to the significant overloads within the local government, which might cause institutional and functional deformation of the Russian political system.

Special attention is drawn to the fact that a significant role in the reproduction of power within the Russian local government bodies is played by manipulative mechanisms based on the indivisibility of political consciousness of the Russian citizens, who traditionally do not regard the local government as a civil institution.

This study has used historical materialist, systemic, structural-functional, sociological, formal-legal, comparative research methods and approaches.

About the authors

Evgeny Aleksandrovich Trofimov

Far East State Agrarian University, Blagoveshchensk

Author for correspondence.
Email: trewal15@yandex.ru

сandidate of Political Science, Associate Professor of Department «Philosophy»

Russian Federation

References

  1. Ovchinnikov I.I. Citizen and local government. Grajdanin i pravo, 2002, no. 7/8, pp. 45–59.
  2. Aleksandrovskiy A. 95 per cent of municipal government bodies are subsidized on the 6th of September, 2001. URL: www.strana.ru/stories/01/09/05/1493/56864.html (дата обращения: 20.05.2013).
  3. Commonwealth of Independent States “About the principles of local government in the states – members of the Commonwealth. Declaration of October 29, 1994”. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/901880427 (дата обращения: 20.05.2014).
  4. Ivanchenko A.V., Kinev A.V., Lubarev A.E. Proportional election system in Russia: history, modern situation, opportunities. URL: www.vibory.ru/Publikat/PES/soderzh.htm (дата обращения: 20.05.2014).
  5. Kinev A.V. “Party lists” in a non-party reality: citizens’ election rights and compulsory partyzation of the local elections. Rossiyskoe elektoralnoe obozrenie, 2010, no. 1, pp. 4–19.
  6. Kinev A.V., Lubarev A.E. Partii i vibori v sovremennoy Rossii: Evoluciya i devoluciya [Parties and elections in modern Russia: evolution and devolution]. Moscow, Liberalnaya missiya publ., 2011, pp. 607–612.
  7. Vasil’ev V.I., Pomazanskiy A.E. Legislative regulation of the election systems used in municipal elections. Jurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2010, no. 8, pp. 16–26.
  8. Lankina T. Reforms of local government bodies in Putin’s time. Federalnaya reforma 2000–2004, pp. 226–267.
  9. Official web-site of election commission of Amur region. URL: www.amur.vybory.izbirkom.ru/region/region/amur?action=show&root=1&tvd=4284003263710&vrn=4284003263706®ion=28&global=&sub_region=28&prver=0&pronetvd=null&vibid=4284003263710&type=234.
  10. Official web-site of election commission of Sakhalin region. URL: sakhalin.izbirkom.ru/isp/sx/art/963824/cp/1/br/929994.html.
  11. Official web-site of election commission of Chukchi autonomous area. URL: chukot.izbirkom.ru/isp/sx/art/950466/cp/1/br/929124.html.
  12. Lubarev A.E. Proportional and mixed election system in regional and municipal elections in the Russian Federation: problems of « faked majority». NB: Voprodi prava i politiki, 2013, no. 8, pp. 65–118.
  13. Velikanova O.V. Leader’s image functions in mass conscience. Hitler Germany and Soviet Russia. Obshestvennie nauki i sovremennost, 1997, no. 6, pp. 162–173.
  14. Titov V.U. Personification of political elite image in the Soviet public opinion: from sacralization to rejection. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2004, no. 282, pp. 118–122.
  15. Trofimov E.A. Principle of subsidiarity and effectiveness of the Russian federalism. Materiali konferencii “Gosudarstvo i pravo: teoriya i praktika” [Government and law: theory and practice]. Chelyabinsk, 2011, pp. 85–89.
  16. Berg O.V. Improvement of cooperation between state government authority and local government bodies in Russia. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2003, no. 5, pp. 17–21.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies