SOME SEMANTIC CLASSES OF NON-OBJECT ORIENTED ACTION VERBS
- Authors: Stakhova L.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Pushkin Leningrad State University, St. Petersburg
- Issue: No 3 (2016)
- Pages: 56-59
- Section: Гуманитарные науки
- URL: https://vektornaukitech.ru/jour/article/view/296
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2073-5073-2016-3-56-59
- ID: 296
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper studies some aspects of the verb semantics from the aspect of a nontraditional approach to researching semantics of linguistic units within morphotopical analysis. The paper analyzes the action verbs, which have the meaning of action as the dominant one. Traditional interpretations of the verbal formative reveal the most common components of verbal semantics, in particular, inclusion of the information about the subject and object of the action into the semantics of the action verb. Morphotopical analysis of a verb reveals a number of features that make up the actional complex.
One of the most characteristic components of the actional complex can be considered an action feature, the presence or absence of which in the semantic structure of the verb enables to select a few semantic classes of action verbs.
The paper considers one of the action verbs class, which semantics does not contain actional feature or contains it only partially, as an intra-object. This class of verbs has been defined as non-object oriented verbs. The quantization procedure of verb semantics of the considered units has been performed on the basis of the morphotopical analysis followed by classification.
The analysis has finally revealed that the non-object oriented verbs form a group of action verbs that includes a few subgroups: non-object oriented verbs themselves; verbs of movement; the verbs that objectify a subject-oriented action (an acting subject acts as a partial object of influence); the verbs that objectify attitude of a subject to the other subject. The subgroup of non-object oriented verbs includes the largest number of units.
About the authors
Larisa Vladimirovna Stakhova
Pushkin Leningrad State University, St. Petersburg
Author for correspondence.
Email: alfalfahay@mail.ru
PhD (Philology), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of practice and theory of translation
Russian FederationReferences
- Avilova N.S. Vid glagola i semantika glagolnogo slova [Verbal aspect and the semantics of the verb]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 328 p.
- Alekseev Yu.G., Semenov M.D. Specifics of the English-Russian translation of some verbs with general semantics in technical texts. Uchenye zapiski Ulyanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, no. 1, pp. 9–16.
- Koryakovtseva E.I. Status of the action name. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1996, no. 3, pp. 55–66.
- Kubryakova E.S. Action verbs through their cognitive characteristics. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Modeli deystviya. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992, pp. 84–90.
- Paducheva E.V. Action verbs: interpretation and collocations. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Modeli deystviya. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992, pp. 69–76.
- Rozina R.I. Verbs with a “human” object. Sokrovennye smysly. Slovo. Tekst. Kultura: sb. statey v chest N.D. Arutyunovoy. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury Publ., 2004, pp. 223–234.
- Stakhova L.V. Verbalization of logical and category of the actional. Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2014, no. 5, pp. 162–168.
- Fefilov A.I. The content of the German and Russian verbs of movement such as gehen – walk – go and their aspectological relations within the speech context (confrontive analysis). Sravnitelnaya tipologiya russkogo i germanskogo yazykov: mezhvuzovskiy tematicheskiy sbornik. Kalinin, Kalininskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 1978, pp. 116–128.
- Ufimtseva A.A. Leksicheskoe znachenie: printsip semiologicheskogo opisaniya leksiki [Lexical Meaning. Principle of semiological description of lexis]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2002. 240 p.
- Arutyunova N.D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl (logiko-semanticheskie problemy) [The sentence and its meaning (the logical-semantic problems)]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2003. 384 p.
- Chafe W.L. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 1970. 360 p.
- Sandmann M. Subject and predicate. A contribution to the Theory of Syntax. Edinburgh, University Press Publ., 1954. 270 p.
- Bulygina T.V., Shmelev A.D. Yazykovaya kontseptualizatsiya mira (na materiale russkoy grammatiki) [Language conceptualization of the world (based on Russian grammar)]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kultury” Publ., 1997. 576 p.
- Knyazev Yu.P. Aktsionalnost i statalnost: ikh sootnoshenie v russkikh konstruktsiyakh s prichastiyami na -n, -t [Actionality and stativity: their correlation in the Russian constructions with participles -n, -t]. München, Verlag Otto Sagner Publ., 1989. 371 p.
- Apresyan Yu.D. Actionality and stativity as hidden meanings (hunting for render). Sokrovennye smysly. Slovo. Tekst. Kultura: sb. statey v chest N.D. Arutyunovoy. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury Publ., 2004, pp. 13–23.
- Fefilov A.I. Osnovy konfrontativnogo analiza leksiki nemetskogo i russkogo yazykov [Basics of confrontive analysis of German and Russian vocabulary]. Kuybyshev, PI Publ., 1985. 81 p.
- Paducheva E.V. Deictic components in semantics of the verbs of motion. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Semantika nachala i kontsa. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2002, pp. 121–136.
- Fefilov A.I. Morfotemnyy analiz edinits yazyka i rechi [Morphothematic analysis of the units of language and speech]. Ulyanovsk, UlGU Publ., 1997. 246 p.
- Fefilov A.I. Methodological principles of morphotopical analysis. Uchenye zapiski Ulyanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Lingvistika, 2002, no. 1, pp. 10–18.
- Stakhova L.V. Sposoby reprezentatsii aktsionalnoy kogerentsii v tekstovykh fragmentakh [Methods of representation of actional coherence in text fragments]. Togliatti, TltSU Publ., 2008. 133 p.