MODERN DETERMINANTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF NATURAL ECONOMIC SYSTEMS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper tests the key determinants of formation and development of the natural economic system as a set of economic relations between the government, businesses and households about the assignment, use, protection and reproduction of the ecosystem benefits that provide conflict-free existence of society and nature. According to the author, the key determinants of the formation and development of the natural economic system are: environmental risks and challenges to social development; the imperatives of sustainable development based on the principles of "green" economy; postindustrial transformations that include the vector for structural and technological modernization of public production, innovation imperatives as a manifestation of the "knowledge economy", as well as increasing demands for comfort of life supporting environment of a human, which is improvement of life quality; accounting in economic policy and economic practices of the ecological value of ecosystem benefits; reproductive approach implying simple and/or expanded reproduction of ecosystem benefits necessary for the normal course of natural processes, as well as benefits sufficient to meet the needs of society and public production; the ecosystem approach as the basis for the integrated management and economic organization of nature in view of the structural and functional integrity of ecological systems; globalization caused by a significant part of the global nature of environmental benefits, common ownership of such benefits, the presence of "human interest of conservation and recreation of nature," a large scale of environmental threats and natural disasters; associated format of the nature management within the boundaries of ecological systems, involving coupling of spatial and sectoral development, a joint assignment of ecosystem benefits and resource flows, consolidation of separate practices in nature management; allowance of national and regional specifics in economic policy and business practices of nature management; partnership, equal dialogue of key stakeholders about the nature management of the government, business and households, consolidated sharing of environmental responsibility among them all.

About the authors

Tatiana Yurievna Anopchenko

Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don

Email: tuanopchenko@sfedu.ru

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Dean of Management Department

Russian Federation

Natalia Vitalievna Medyanik

Pyatigorsk affiliate of North-Caucasian Federal University, Pyatigorsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: natalya-medyanik@yandex.ru

Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department «National and Municipal Management»

Russian Federation

References

  1. Prodanova N.A. Sovershenstvovanie mehanizma upravleniya ekologo-ekonomicheskimi protivorechiyami v regional’nih socio-prirodohozyaystvennih sistemah [Improvement of mechanism for management of ecological and economic conflicts in regional natural and socio-economic systems]. Moscow, Sodeystvie ХХI vek, 2011, 224 p.
  2. Ponomareva M.A. Formirovanie organizacionno-ekonomicheskogo mehanizma upravleniya ustoychivim razvitiem prirodo-hozyaystvennoy sistemy regiona. Avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Forming of organizational and economic mechanism of managing the sustainable development of natural-economic system of the region: temporal-territorial approach]. Rostov-na-Donu, 2012, 56 p.
  3. Papenov K.V., Yakovlev A.A. Economy and ecology: current challenges and perspectives. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii, 2012, no. 3, pp. 78–82.
  4. Ursul A.D. Global phenomena and methods of socio-natural interaction. Politika i obshestvo, 2013, no. 12, pp. 1465–1478.
  5. Pahomava N.V., Rihter K.K., Malishkov G.B. Sustainable development strategy and conversion to the green economy: renewal of priority and mechanisms. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Ekonomika, 2013, no. 4, pp. 35–54.
  6. United Nations Millennium Declaration. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 55/2 of 8 September, 2000. URL: www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/summitdecl.shtml.
  7. Perspektiva 2050: novaya politico-ekonomicheskaya kartina mira [Perspective 2050: a new political and economic picture of the world]. Moscow, Fond “Postkrizisniy mir”, 2013, 124 p.
  8. Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses from Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970-2012). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization, 2014. 44 р.
  9. Braun L. Kak izbejat’ klimaticheskih katastrof? [How to avoid climatic catastrophe?]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2010, 590 p.
  10. Faucheux S., Joumni H. Economie et politique des changements climatiques. Paris: La découverte-slf,‎ 2005. 128 p.
  11. Strand J., Toman M. «Green Stimulus», Economic Recovery, and Long Term Sustainable Development. Policy Research Working Paper 5163. The World Bank Development Research Group, Environment and Energy Team. January 2010. WPS5163. URL: library1.nida.ac.th/worldbankf/fulltext/wps05163.pdf.
  12. Bezrukih P.P. About the role of sustainable energy in sustainable development. Na puti k ustoychivomu razvitiyu Rossii, 2013, no. 66, pp. 17–19.
  13. Ustoychivoye razvitie Rossii [Sustainable development in Russia]. Berlin, Russko-nemezkoe byuro ekologicheskoy informacii, 2013, 224 p.
  14. Savchenko P.V., Fedorova M.N. Dual human nature: a human as an economic and social entity. Problemi sovremennoy ekonomiki, 2009, no. 2, pp. 90–95.
  15. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: General Synthesis Report. Washington: Island Press, 2005. 219 р.
  16. World fisheries production by capture and aquaculture (AQ), by ISSCAAP divisions (1950-2012). URL: ftp.fao.org/FI/CDrom/CD_yearbook_2012/root/aquaculture/a0.pdf.
  17. Global Environment Outlook (GEO-5) Environment for the future we want. Valletta: Malta by Progress Press Ltd, 2012. 528 р.
  18. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on biological diversity at its fifth meeting. Decision V/6. UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23. Nairobi. 2000, 15–26 May. URL: www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/COP-05-dec-en.pdf.
  19. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Eco-socio-humanitarian openness of political economy as an alternative to economic imperialism. Obshestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, 2013, no. 3, pp. 134–151.
  20. Ostrom E. Upravlyaya obshim: eloluciya institutov kollektivnih deystviy [Managing the common: evolution of institutes of social actions]. Moscow, IRISEN, 2010, 447 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies