CIVIL IDENTITY OF MODERN RUSSIAN GENERATION X (ON THE EXAMPLE OF ASTRAKHAN REGION)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

One of the key characteristics of democratic and sustained development of the Russian state in modern times is the degree of population cohesion on the general civil basis. Modern Russian Generation X is represented by the citizens who were born in the Soviet Union between 1963 and 1984. Their socialization process (its main stage) concurred with such events as restructuring, disintegration of the USSR, “dashing” 1990s; today they make up a third of the population and the basis of the labor force of the country; that is why the analysis of the civil identity of Russians in this age group is so important.

The paper presents the results of a sociological survey conducted in the Astrakhan region to study the characteristics of the civil identity of the region population, in particular the representatives of Generation X. Certain levels of identity (civil, regional and ethnic) have been considered, as well as value system and orientations, patriotic feelings, and ways to implement the civil rights.

The author analyzes the conditions for the development of the Russian Generation X and the assessment of its civil identity. Data obtained as a result of research in Astrakhan region led to the conclusion of the civil identity of the studied population group, of such components of the analyzed scientific category as cognitive, evaluative, and activity; special attention is paid to the patriotic aspect.

As a part of the study of the current issue of population consolidation, as well as the further development of Russian democracy, important are the conclusions made in the paper about the overrepresentation of civil identity in Generation X, the dominance of electoral participation in the processes of civil rights implementation.

About the authors

Vera Valerievna Diakova

Astrakhan State Technical University, Astrakhan

Author for correspondence.
Email: vvdyakova@yandex.ru

assistant of Chair “Sociology and psychology”

Россия

References

  1. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2002. 52 p.
  2. Tajfel H. Instrumentality, identity and social comparisons. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1982, pp. 483–507.
  3. Turner J.C. Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5–34.
  4. Moscovici S. Notes toward a description of social representations. European Journal Social Psychology, 1988, vol. 18, pp. 211–250.
  5. Levada Yu.A. Frames of References for Man. Summing up the Study of “Homo Sovieticus”. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 2001, no. 1, pp. 7–15.
  6. Yadov V.A. The social and socio-psychological mechanisms of person’s social identity formation. Mir Rossii: sotsiologiya, etnologiya, 1995, no. 3-4, pp. 158–181.
  7. Popova O.V. Politicheskaya identifikatsiya v usloviyakh transformatsii obshchestva [Political identity in the transformation of society]. Sankt Petersburg, Sankt-Petersburgskiy universitet Publ., 2002. 258 p.
  8. Balich N.L. Social identity: theoretical and methodological grounds of sociological analysis. Sotsiologicheskiy almanakh, 2013, no. 4, pp. 214–220.
  9. Shikova R.Yu. Identity of Russian youth in conditions of sociocultural transformation. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kulturologiya, 2010, no. 1, pp. 109–113.
  10. Vodolazhskaya T.V. Civil identity. Obrazovatelnaya politika, 2010, no. 5-6, pp. 140–141.
  11. Glotov M.B. Generation as a category of sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2004, no. 10, pp. 42–48.
  12. Ivanova E.I. Generation problem and population reproduction. Theoretical approaches vs realities. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2012, no. 4, pp. 42–57.
  13. Semenova V.V. Social portrait of generations. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2002, pp. 184–212.
  14. Vodolazhskaya T.V., Katsuk N.L. Generations as subject of social and cultural environment: problem setting and opportunities for research. Sotsiologicheskoe znanie i sotsialnye protsessy v sovremennom belorusskom obshchestve: cb. statey V mezhinstitutskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh. Minsk, Institut sotsiologii Publ., 2005, pp. 30–42.
  15. Howe N., Strauss W. Generations: the history of America’s future. 1584 to 2069. New York, Quill William Morrow Publ., 1991. 544 p.
  16. Shamis E., Antipov A. The theory of generations. Marketing Menedzhment, 2007, no. 6. URL: old.e-xecutive.ru/publications/specialization/newfolder8086/article_5457/.
  17. Kovaleva A.I. Sotsializatsiya lichnosti: norma i otklonenie [Personality's socialization: norm and deviation]. Moscow, In-t molodezhi Publ., 1996. 224 p.
  18. Ruchkin B.A. Youth and formation of a new Russian. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1998, no. 5, pp. 90–98.
  19. Kozlov A.A. Molodye patrioty i grazhdane novoy Rossii: sotsiologicheskiy ocherk [Young patriots and citizens of new Russia: sociological essay]. Sankt Petersburg, OM-Ekspress Publ., 1999. 542 p.
  20. Zeletdinova E.A., Dyakov O.Yu., Dyakova V.V. Vlast-oppozitsionnye otnosheniya i stabilnost sotsialno-politicheskogo razvitiya [Regime-oppositional relations and stability of social and political development]. Astrakhan’, AGTU Publ., 2014. 240 p.
  21. Denisova G.S., Klimenko L.V. Multilevel identity of the population of the south of Russia: the parity of the all-Russian, regional and ethnic components. Rossiyskiy akademicheskiy zhurnal, 2011, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 17–24.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies