“NEW RELIGIOUS CONSCIOUSNESS” AS A SOCIAL PROJECT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper researches the concepts of such representatives of the “new religious consciousness” movement as D. Merezhkovsky, Z. Gippius, and D. Filosofov as part of the history of Russian sociology. The “new religious consciousness” is recognized as the religious and philosophical movement in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century, whose adherents advocated the need for renewal of Christianity and spiritual revival of an individual and the society. Contemporary researchers, who recognize the need to study the sociological component of the ideological heritage of religious philosophers of the late XIX – early XX century, turn to the works of such thinkers as V. Soloviev, P. Struve, N. Berdyaev, S. Bulgakov, S. Frank, and E. Trubetskoy. Theories of other representatives of the “new religious consciousness” are not taken into account by the Russian sociologists.

The aim of the work is to analyze the concept of D. Merezhkovsky, Z. Gippius, and D. Filosofov – the representatives of the radical wing of the “new religious consciousness” movement – from the perspective of their contribution to the development of sociological thought. The author suggests that, due to certain features of this concept, it can be viewed as a social project. The social project is characterized by the presence of a certain image of an ideal social order and also provides for the creation of the socio-cultural conditions necessary to achieve this ideal. It is found that the social ideal within the framework of this concept included religious and socio-political content. Characteristic features of Merezhkovsky’s, Gippius’s and Filosofov’s theory are analyzed. The author comes to the conclusion that the “new religious consciousness” as a social project differs in its orientation towards a practical change in social relations. The results of the research show that the religious and philosophical projects of the early 20th century rank high in the history of Russian sociology.

About the authors

Anastasiya Anatolievna Voevodina

Samara State Institute of Culture, Samara

Author for correspondence.
Email: avoevodina@list.ru

PhD (History), assistant professor of Chair of Philosophy and Philology

Россия

References

  1. Vorontsova I.V. Russkaya religiozno-filosofskaya mysl’ v nachale XX veka [Russian religious and philosophical thought in the early twentieth century]. Moscow, PSTGU Publ., 2008. 420 p.
  2. Kuvakin V.A. Religioznaya filosofiya v Rossii. Nachalo XX veka [Religious philosophy in Russia. Early 20th century]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1980. 309 p.
  3. Kurabtsev V.L. New religious consciousness. Russkaya filosofiya. Entsiklopediya. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2014, pp. 424–426.
  4. Savelyev S.N. Ideynoe bankrotstvo bogoiskatelstva v Rossii v nachale XX veka [Ideological bankruptcy of God-seeking in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century]. Leningrad, Leningradskiy universitet Publ., 1987. 184 p.
  5. Matveeva N.Yu. Methodology of social knowledge in Russian religious philosophy. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2004, no. 1, pp. 61–68.
  6. Minenkov G.Ya. Vvedenie v istoriyu rossiyskoy sotsiologii [Introduction to the history of Russian sociology]. Minsk, Ekonompress Publ., 2000. 343 p.
  7. Kukushkina E.I., ed. Razvitie sotsiologii v Rossii (s momenta zarozhdeniya do kontsa XX veka) [The development of sociology in Russia (from the time of its inception to the end of the twentieth century)]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2006. 456 p.
  8. Levko P.I. The concept of “social design” and its relationship with the forecast, plan, program. Pravo.by, 2011, no. 3, pp. 125–129.
  9. Biryukova M.V. Social projection as a subject of sociological analysis. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2016, no. 2, pp. 52–53.
  10. Shlyapnikov S.E. Social designing as designing time in social systems. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, no. 342, pp. 75–76.
  11. Goryunov A.V. Social ideal in the cognitive structure of a project. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kultura, 2014, no. 2, pp. 8–12.
  12. Merezhkovkdy D.S. Ne mir, no mech. K budushchey kritike khristianstva [Not the world, but the sword. To the future criticism of Christianity]. Sankt Petersburg, Izdatelstvo M.V. Pirozhkova Publ., 1908. 208 p.
  13. Merezhkovkdy D.S. Atlantida – Evropa. Tayna zapada [Mystery of the West: Atlantis–Europe]. Moscow, Russkaya kniga Publ., 1992. 416 p.
  14. Gippius Z.N. The Great way. Golos zhizni, 1914, no. 7, pp. 13–17.
  15. Merezhkovkdy D.S., Gippius Z.N., Filosofov D.V. Tsar’ i revolyutsiya [King and Revolution]. Moscow, OGI Publ., 1999. 219 p.
  16. Zapiski peterburgskikh Religiozno-filosofskikh sobraniy (1901–1903 gg.) [Notes of St. Petersburg Religious and Philosophical Meetings (1901–1903)]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2005. 543 p.
  17. Merezhkovkdy D.S. V tikhom omute. Statyi i issledovaniya raznykh let [In a quiet whirlpool. Articles and studies of different years]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1991. 496 p.
  18. Filosofov D.V. Neugasimaya lampada. Statyi po tserkovnym i religioznym voprosam [Undying sanctuary lamp. Articles on church and religious affairs]. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo I.D. Sytina Publ., 1912. 204 p.
  19. Gippius Z.N. (Anton Krayniy). Literaturniy dnevnik (1899–1907) [Literary diary (1899–1907)]. Moscow, Agraf Publ., 2000. 320 p.
  20. Gippius Z.N. Dnevniki [Diaries]. Moscow, NPK Intelvak Publ., 1999. Vol. 1, 736 p.
  21. Merezhkovkdy D.S. Bolnaya Rossiya [Sick Russia]. Leningrad, Leningradskiy universitet Publ., 1991. 267 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies