On the possibility of local measurement of crack resistance of structural steels taking into account the structure

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The scale of heterogeneity of the structures of steels and alloys can be rather large both within one sample and within a product. The procedure adopted in practice for determining the integral values of crack resistance characteristics cannot always reflect this circumstance. In this regard, it is necessary to develop methods for assessing the crack resistance of a medium with a heterogeneous structure. In this work, the authors determined the crack resistance of large forgings made of heat-hardenable 38KhN3MFA-Sh steel (0.38%C–Cr–3%Ni–Mo–V) based on the critical crack opening δс and the J-integral. The presence of critical stages in the development of a ductile crack during testing was assessed by acoustic emission measurements. In combination with the obtained methods of digital fractography of 3D images of fractures, this allowed relating the shape and position of the leading edge of each crack jump to the load-displacement diagram. Measuring the crack opening geometry during the test showed the possibility of determining directly the coefficient of crack face rotation when estimating δс. In general, this allowed constructing a map of the distribution of parameter δс values over the thickness of the sample and estimating the scale of the scatter in crack resistance within one sample – up to 30 %. Such a localization of measurements, primarily of the δc parameter, is comparable to the scale of heterogeneity in the morphology of various types of structures, which was assessed based on the measurement of digital images of the dendritic structure, the Bauman sulfur print, non-metallic inclusions on an unetched section, and ferrite-pearlite banding in the microstructure. This makes it possible to link local crack resistance values to various fracture mechanisms and their accompanying structural components.

About the authors

Maxim I. Sergeyev

University of Science and Technology MISIS

Author for correspondence.
Email: m1600219@edu.misis.ru

postgraduate student

Russian Federation, 119049, Russia, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 4, block 1

Egor V. Pogorelov

University of Science and Technology MISIS

Email: egor.pogorelov11@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6768-5038

postgraduate student

Russian Federation, 119049, Russia, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 4, block 1

Artemiy A. Dudarev

University of Science and Technology MISIS

Email: artemdudarev@mail.ru

graduate student

Russian Federation, 119049, Russia, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 4, block 1

Elina A. Sokolovskaya

University of Science and Technology MISIS

Email: Sokolovskaya@misis.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9381-9223

PhD (Engineering), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Metal Science and Physics of Strength

Russian Federation, 119049, Russia, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 4, block 1

Aleksandr V. Kudrya

University of Science and Technology MISIS

Email: AVKudrya@misis.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor, professor of Chair of Materials Science and Strength Physics

Russian Federation, 119049, Russia, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 4, block 1

References

  1. Shtremel M.A. Razrushenie. Razrushenie materiala [Destruction. Rupture of material]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 2015. Kn. 1, 975 p.
  2. Shtremel M.A. Razrushenie. Razrushenie struktur [Destruction. Rupture of structures]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 2015. Kn. 2, 975 p.
  3. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A., Tang V.F. Possibility of predicting the destruction of metal materials with a heterogeneous structure. Russian metallurgy (Metally), 2022, vol. 2022, no. 10, pp. 1318–1331. doi: 10.1134/S0036029522100160.
  4. Kazakov A.A., Kiselev D.V., Kazakova E.I. Quantitative methods for assessing the microstructure of steel and alloys for revising outdated GOST standards. Lite i metallurgiya, 2021, no. 2, pp. 42–48. doi: 10.21122/1683-6065-2021-2-42-48.
  5. Kudrya A.V., Nikulin S.A., Nikolaev Y.A., Arsenkin A.M., Sokolovskaya E.A., Skorodumov S.V., Chernobaeva A.A., Kuzko E.I., Khoreva E.G. Nonuniformity of the ductility of 15X2HMFA low-alloy steel. Steel in Translation, 2009, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 742–747. EDN: QCKREZ.
  6. Tan Long, Li Songyang, Zhao Liangyin, Wang Lulu, Zhao Xiuxiu. The effect of mechanical inhomogeneity in microzones of welded joints on CTOD fracture toughness of nuclear thick-walled steel. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2023, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 4112–4119. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2023.07.031.
  7. Li Ai, Soltangharaei V., Greer B., Bayat M., Ziehl P. Structural health monitoring of stainless-steel nuclear fuel storage canister using acoustic emission. Developments in the Built Environment, 2024, vol. 17, article number 100294. doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100294.
  8. Xu Jie, Sun Tong, Xu Yantao, Han Qinghua. Fracture toughness research of G20Mn5QT cast steel based on the acoustic emission technique. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, vol. 230, article number 116904. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116904.
  9. Vorontsov V.B., Pershin V.K. Correlation between Acoustic Emission and the Local Structural Restructuring in the Nonequilibrium Aluminum Melt. Russian Metallurgy (Metally), 2020, vol. 2020, no. 2, pp. 92–101. doi: 10.1134/S0036029520020160.
  10. Botvina L.R., Tyutin M.R., Bolotnikov A.I., Petersen T.B. effect of preliminary cycling on the acoustic emission characteristics of structural 15Kh2GMF steel. Russian Metallurgy (Metally), 2021, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 32–41. EDN: INTJOA.
  11. Sokolovskaya E.A., Kudrya A.V., Kodirov D.F., Sergeev M.I., Budanova E.S., Samoshina M.E. On the reliability of the results of digital measurements of images of structures in metal science. Metallurg, 2024, no. 1, pp. 36–39. EDN: DGYMXQ.
  12. Makhutov N.A. Evolution of laboratory researches and diagnostics of materials. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov, 2022, vol. 88, no. 1-1, pp. 5–13. doi: 10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-1-I-5-13.
  13. Nikitin Y. Asymptotic efficiency of nonparametric tests. New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1995. 274 p.
  14. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A., Ngo Kh.N., Kuzko E.I., Kotishevskiy G.V. Fracture forecasting of large-size forged pieces with multi-scale structure. Russian metallurgy (metally), 2019, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1304–1308. doi: 10.1134/S0036029519120115.
  15. Rabotnov Yu.N., ed. Novye metody otsenki soprotivleniya metallov khrupkomu razrusheniyu [New methods for assessing the resistance of metals to brittle fracture]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1972. 438 p.
  16. Khanzhin V.G., Shtremel M.A. Quantitative information on fracture processes obtained by measurement of acoustic emission. Metal Science and Heat Treatment, 2009, vol. 51, no. 5-6, pp. 250–255. doi: 10.1007/s11041-009-9146-4.
  17. Shtremel M.A., Karabasova L.V., Chizhikov V.I., Vodeniktov S.I. About optimal alloying of high-vanadium high-speed steel. Metal Science and Heat Treatment, 1999, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 146–150. doi: 10.1007/bf02465798.
  18. Shtremel M.L., Belomyttsev M.Yu., Medvedev V.V., Mochalov B.V., Chernukha L.G. The structure and features of composite materials having web structure on the base of NiAl intermetallide. Izvestiya. Ferrous metallurgy, 2006, no. 1, pp. 40–44. EDN: HTDWRB.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Sergeyev M.I., Pogorelov E.V., Dudarev A.A., Sokolovskaya E.A., Kudrya A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies