Email this article SUBJECT VERBALIZATION IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE
- Authors: Krapivkina O.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk
- Issue: No 4 (2015)
- Pages: 121-124
- Section: Гуманитарные науки
- URL: https://vektornaukitech.ru/jour/article/view/338
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2073-5073-2015-4-121-124
- ID: 338
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper researches linguistic units used to verbalize the author in academic discourse. It is a case study of 40 academic papers (10,000–12,000 words in each) in Humanities published in English- and Russian-language journals. The paper distinguishes between three discourse roles of the speaking subject in academic discourse: a researcher, an opinion-holder, and a representative. The paper also compares the frequency with which the linguistic units are used to represent the subject in English and Russian texts. The analysis shows that the Russian authors prefer representing their roles with the first-person plural pronoun as well as implying themselves in subjectless constructions. In English papers, the subject can be verbalized with the first-person singular pronoun, but the most frequent marker is the personified point of view construction. We conclude that the implication of the speaking subject in order to give objective tone to the discourse is typical of both English and Russian papers. The article applies quantitative and qualitative methods, and a comparative analysis. The research is of practical value for the Russian authors who should adhere to all the standards of the English-speaking academic community when preparing their papers for English-language journals.
About the authors
Olga Aleksandrovna Krapivkina
Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk
Author for correspondence.
Email: koa1504@mail.ru
Associate Professor, assistant professor of Foreign Languages Department
РоссияReferences
- Krapivkina O.A. On the personified mature of modern legal discourse. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2010, no. 4, pp. 27–34.
- Krapivkina O.A. Subyekt v yuridicheskom diskurse: lingvopragmaticheskiy analiz [Subject of the legal discourse: linguistic and pragmatic analysis]. Irkutsk, IrGTU Publ., 2015. 158 p.
- Arnold I.V. Osnovy nauchnykh issledovaniy v lingvistike [Fundamentals of scientific research in linguistics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1991. 140 p.
- Boldyreva A.A., Kashkin V.B. Features of expression of the author’s "I" in scientific discourse (based on English and Russian written texts). Yazyk, kommunikatsii i sotsialnaya sreda, 2002, no. 2, pp. 99–108.
- Gnezdechko O.N. Avtorizatsiya nauchnogo diskursa: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskiy aspekt (na materiale angloyazychnykh statey sovremennykh evropeyskikh i amerikanskikh lingvistov). Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Authorization of scientific discourse: communicative and pragmatic aspect (based on English articles of modern European and American linguists)]. Kiev, 2005. 20 p.
- Ivanov V.V. Chet ili nechet. Asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem [Odd or even. The asymmetry of the brain and sign systems]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1978. 285 p.
- Bernard J.A. Tips for Academic Writing and Other Formal Writing. URL: homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/jbednar/writingtips.html.
- Hyland K. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 2001, no. 20, pp. 207–226.
- Hyland K. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002, no. 34, pp. 109–112.
- Cherry R.D. Ethos versus Persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication, 1998, no. 15, pp. 384–410.
- Kuo C-H. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 1999, no. 18-2, pp. 121–138.
- Tang R. The ‘I’ identity: Exploring Writer Identity in Student Academic Writing Through the First Person Pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 1999, no. 18, pp. 23–39.
- Vladimirou D. Personal Reference in Linguistic Journal Articles. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2006, no. 1, pp. 139–157.
- Munoz M.C. The ‘I’ in Interaction: Authorial Presence in Academic Writing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, no. 8, pp. 49–58.
- Harwood N. We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory ... The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 2005, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 343–375.
- Harwood N. (In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science: A Qualitative Study and a Proposed Heuristic for Future Research. Written Communication, 2006, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 424–460.
- Ivanič R. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1998. 301 p.
- Vassileva I. Who Am I / Who are We in Academic Writing? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1998, no. 8-2, pp. 163–190.
- Krapivkina O. Pronominal choice in Academic Discourse. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 2014, no. 20-7, pp. 833–843.
- Krapivkina O. Pragmatic Effects of First-Person Pronouns in Academic Discourse. European Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 2015, no. 2, pp. 22–27.
Supplementary files
