CHARACTERISTICS OF NATURE IMAGES AND MOTIVES IN THE POETRY OF A. SHIRYAEVETS (LINGUISTIC AND CULTURAL ASPECT)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper gives characteristics of specific images, nature motives and landscape complexes in the works of A. Shiryaevets within the general cultural aspect of Russian literature, folklore Slavic tradition, as well as more ancient cultural layers related to archetypes and mythological consciousness. In particular, the author considered such floral motifs and images as the tree (forest) above the grave symbolizing eternity, the birch as a symbol of retained connection with homeland and childhood, the apple blossom symbolizing smoke, love to Russia, to native nature, and green leaves as the elements of ideal summer landscape. The paper considers the interaction of these images and motives with the world tree archetype, with the national symbolism of the oak, apple-tree, lilac, birch, and forest, with the ceremonies, rituals, and legends.

The paper connects floral images and motives with basic themes and topics of works of A. Shiryaevets: this life impermanence, the separation from the homeland, memories about childhood, love experience. The author identified key sense oppositions including the following poetic images: homeland and outland, faraway and close, childhood and manhood, past and present. As the result of this analysis, common and specific features of the nationwide image of Russia, native Volga land created in the works of the poet are identified.

The paper reveals the poet’s individual style features in the description of floral images and motives and identifies that the vocalizations of folk poetic manner play the leading role.

About the authors

Marina Gennadyevna Sokolova

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: M.Sokolova@tltsu.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Russian Language and Literature”

Россия

References

  1. Gachev G.D. About national worldviews. Narody Azii i Afriki, 1976, no. 1, pp. 77–85.
  2. Kornilov O.A. Yazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye natsionalnykh mentalitetov [Linguistic world-images as the derivatives of national mentalities]. 2nd ed. Moscow, ChERo Publ., 2003. 327 p.
  3. Maslova V.A. Lingvokulturologiya [Cultural linguistics]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2007. 208 p.
  4. Serebrennikov B.A., ed. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke. Yazyk i kartina mira [The role of human factor in language. Language and world-image]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 216 p.
  5. Epshteyn M.N. “Priroda, mir, taynik vselennoy…”. Sistema peyzazhnykh obrazov v russkoy poezii [“Nature, world, universe secrecy…”. The system of landscape images in Russian poetry]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1990. 303 p.
  6. Bolotnova N.S. Filologichesky analiz teksta [Philological text analysis]. 4th ed. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2009. 520 p.
  7. Teliya V.N. Metaphorization and its role in creation of linguistic world-image. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke. Yazyk i kartina mira. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, pp. 173–204.
  8. Teliya V.N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semantichesky, pragmatichesky i lingvokulturologichesky aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguistic and cultural aspects]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kultury” Publ., 1996. 288 p.
  9. Agranovich S.Z., Konyushikhina M.V., Petrushkin A.I., Rassovskaya L.P., Stefansky E.E. U korney Mirovogo Dreva. Mif kak kulturniy kod [At the roots of World Tree. Myth as a cultural code]. Samara, Bakhrakh-M Publ., 2015. 448 p.
  10. Afanasyev A.N. Poeticheskie vozzreniya slavyan na prirody [Poetic views of the Slavs on the nature]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 1994. Vol. 1, 800 p.
  11. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. 423 p.
  12. Likhachev D.S. Velikoe nasledie: klassicheskie proizvedeniya literatury Drevney Rusi [Great Heritage: Classic Works of Old Russian Literature]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1975. 367 p.
  13. Meletinsky E.M. O literaturnykh arkhetipakh [About literary archetypes]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 1994. 133 p.
  14. Propp V.Ya. Folklor. Literatura. Istoriya [Folklore. Literature. History]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 2002. 464 p.
  15. Toporov V.N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: research in the area of mythopoetic]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1995. 624 p.
  16. Shiryaevets A. Pesni volzhskogo solov’ya [Songs of Volga Philomela]. Togliatti, Fond “Dukhovnoe nasledie” Publ., 2007. 276 p.
  17. Teliya V.N., ed. Bolshoy frazeologichesky slovar russkogo yazyka: znachenie, upotreblenie, kulturologicheskiy kommentariy [Great phraseological dictionary of the Russian language: meaning, usage, culturological commentary]. 2nd ed. Moscow, AST-PRESS KNIGA Publ., 2006. 784 p.
  18. Meletinsky E.M., ed. Mifologichesky slovar [Mythology dictionary]. Moscow, Bolshaya Rossiyskaya Entsiklopediya Publ., 1982. 736 p.
  19. Skovorodnikov A.P., ed. Vyrazitelnye sredstva russkogo yazyka i rechevye oshibki i nedochety [Expressive means of the Russian language and slips of the tongue]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2005. 480 p.
  20. Selemeneva O.A. The anthropomorphous states of the nature in the Russian linguistic picture of the world. FILOLOGOS, 2012, no. 1, pp. 87–93.
  21. Selemeneva O.A. Statements with the semantics “State of nature”: linguoculturological aspect of the analysis. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2015, no. 7-1, pp. 161–164.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies