The comparison of the main time-frequency transformations of spectral analysis of acoustic emission signals

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Due to the intensive development of spectroscopic techniques for detecting acoustic emission signals, the problem of providing the best time-frequency resolution through the application of specific time-frequency transformation algorithms comes to the fore. The Short-Time Fourier Transform, the Wavelet Transform, the Smoothed Pseudo Wigner Distribution, the Choi-Williams Distribution, and the Hilbert-Huang Transform are currently the main time-frequency transformations used or integrated into the acoustic emission method. However, today in the literature, there is not enough information that allows evaluating time-frequency transformations regarding the effectiveness of their application to specify the features of discrete and continuous acoustic emission signals. On this basis, the authors carried out an experimental comparison of synthetic and actual model signals to determine the efficiency of specified time-frequency transformations. The synthetic model signals were a chirp signal, ideal sinusoids, and a Dirac delta function. The actual signals were a discrete acoustic emission signal from the Hsu Nelson source decomposed into dispersion modes in the acoustic channel and a continuous acoustic emission signal from the air outflow through a calibrated hole. The analysis shows that only the Fourier transform and the Wavelet transform can define all control features of model signals at the frequency components’ energy gap of about 25 dB. Wigner Distribution, Choi-Williams Distribution, and Hilbert-Huang Transform demonstrated higher time-frequency resolution did not identify frequency components of low energy. Therefore, the authors recommend using them to identify spectral changes in the resonance and discrete signals but in the narrow energy range. The Fourier transform and the Wavelet transform demonstrated the best result to analyze continuous acoustic emission. However, to use the latter, the procedure of selection of the optimal basis function is necessary. The study determined that the Hilbert-Huang transform allows identifying the frequency fluctuations, but it is necessary to develop ways to increase sensitivity and extract basic information from the spectrograms to enhance the validity of its results.

About the authors

Inna I. Rastegaeva

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Email: I.Rastegaeva@tltsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7634-2328

senior lecturer of Chair “Nanotechnologies, Materials Science, and Mechanics”

Россия

Igor A. Rastegaev

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: RastIgAev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3807-8105

PhD (Physics and Mathematics), senior researcher of the Research Unit-2 of the Research Institute of Advanced Technologies

Россия

Einar A. Agletdinov

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Email: aeinar7@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6956-941X

PhD (Physics and Mathematics), junior researcher of the Research Unit-2 of the Research Institute of Advanced Technologies

Россия

Dmitry L. Merson

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Email: D.Merson@tltsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5006-4115

Doctor of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Professor, Director of the Research Institute of Advanced Technologies

Россия

References

  1. Caesarendra W., Tjahjowidodo T. A Review of Feature Extraction Methods in Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring and Its Application for Degradation Trend Estimation of Low-Speed Slew Bearing. Machines, 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, article number 21. doi: 10.3390/machines5040021.
  2. Rastegaev I.A., Danyuk A.V., Vinogradov A.Yu., Merson D.L., Rastegaeva I.I. Analysis of noise-like signals of acoustic emission methods broadband filtering. Kontrol. Diagnostika, 2014, no. 8, pp. 49–55. doi: 10.14489/td.2014.08.pp.049-056.
  3. Shivani G., Vandna B. Signal Analysis for High Speed Acoustic Data Using Acoustic Emission Analysis Tool. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2015, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 541–544. doi: 10.21275/v4i12.nov151837.
  4. Vaezi Y., Van der Baan M. Comparison of the STA/LTA and power spectral density methods for microseismic event detection. Geophysical Journal International, 2015, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 1896–1908. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggv419.
  5. Rastegaev I.A., Merson D.L., Rastegaeva I.I., Vinogradov A.Yu. A Time-Frequency based Approach for Acoustic Emission Assessment of Sliding Wear. Lubricants, 2020, vol. 8, no. 5, article number 52. doi: 10.3390/lubricants8050052.
  6. Cheshev M.E., Kulkov D.S. Cluster analysis of key features of acoustic emission signals in rock specimens. Part 1: Overview of clustering algorithms. Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-rossiyskogo slavyanskogo universiteta, 2019, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 160–164.
  7. Ivanov V.I., Barat V.A. Akustiko-emissionnaya diagnostika [Acoustic emission diagnostics]. Moscow, Spektr Publ., 2017. 368 p.
  8. Ono K. Acoustic Emission. Springer Handbook of Acoustics. New York, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Publ., 2014, pp. 1209–1229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0755-7_30.
  9. Firsov A.V., Posadov V.V. Diagnosis of defects of rolling element bearings at poster's argument-CI small-sized high-speed gas-turbine engine using a spectraltion of vibration analysis. Kontrol. Diagnostika, 2013, no. 7, pp. 40–47.
  10. Yablokov A.V., Serdyukov A.S. Method of automated extracting of dispersion curves based on time-frequency distribution of seismic datav. Geofizicheskie tekhnologii, 2019, no. 3, pp. 48–58. doi: 10.18303/2619-1563-2018-3-5.
  11. Chi-Duran R., Comte D., Diaz M., Silva J.F. Automatic detection of P- and S-wave arrival times: new strategies based on the modified fractal method and basic matching pursuit. Journal of Seismology, 2017, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1171–1184. doi: 10.1007/s10950-017-9658-0.
  12. Kaul B.C., Lawler B., Zahdeh A. Engine Diagnostics Using Acoustic Emissions Sensors. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2016, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 684–692. doi: 10.4271/2016-01-0639.
  13. Feng Z., Liang M., Chu F. Recent advances in time-frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: A review with application examples. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 165–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.017.
  14. Yan J., Laflamme S., Singh P., Sadhu A., Dodson J. A Comparison of Time-Frequency Methods for Real-Time Application to High-Rate Dynamic Systems. Vibration, 2020, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 204–216. doi: 10.3390/vibration3030016.
  15. Lazorenko O.V., Chernogor L.F. Ultra-wideband signals and physical processes. 2. Methods of analysis and application. Radiofizika i radioastronomiya, 2008, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 270–322.
  16. Merkusheva A.V. Transformation classes for nonstationary signals in information measurement systems. II. Time-frequency transforms. Nauchnoe priborostroenie, 2002, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 59–70.
  17. Huang N.E., Shen S.S.P. Hilbert–Huang Transform and Its Applications. Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences. Singapore, World Scientific Publ., 2014. Vol. 5, 311 p. doi: 10.1142/5862.
  18. Liu Y., An H., Bian S. Hilbert-Huang Transform and the Application. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems, 2020, no. 20-22, pp. 534–539. doi: 10.1109/ICAIIS49377.2020.9194944.
  19. Novak A., Lotton P., Simon L. Synchronized Swept-Sine: Theory, Application, and Implementation. AES: Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 2015, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 786–798. doi: 10.17743/jaes.2015.0071.
  20. Dhar S.S., Kundu D., Das U. Tests For the Parameters of Chirp Signal Model. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2019, vol. 67, no. 16, pp. 4291–4301. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2019.2928996.
  21. Terentev D.A. Time-frequency analysis for identification of acoustic emission signals. V mire nerazrushayushchego kontrolya, 2013, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 51–55.
  22. Rastegaev I.A., Danyuk A.V., Merson D.L., Vinogradov A.Yu. Universal Educational and Research Facility for the Study of the Processes of Generation and Propagation of Acoustic Emission Waves. Inorganic Materials, 2017, vol. 53, no. 15, pp. 1548–1554. doi: 10.1134/S0020168517150158.
  23. Viktorov I.A. Fizicheskie osnovy primeneniya ultrazvukovykh voln Releya i Lemba v tekhnike [Physical bases of application of Rayleigh and Lamb ultrasonic waves in engineering]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966. 168 p.
  24. Drobot Yu.B., Greshnikov V.A., Bachegov V.N. Akusticheskoe kontaktnoe techeiskanie [Acoustic contact leak detection]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1989. 120 p.
  25. Kharris F.Dzh. The use of windows in harmonic analysis by the discrete Fourier transform method. Trudy instituta inzhenerov po elektrotekhnike i radioelektronike (TIIER), 1978, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 60–96.
  26. Nuttall A.H. Some Windows with Very Good Sidelobe Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1981, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 84–91.
  27. Koronovskiy A.A., Khramov A.E. Nepreryvnyy veyvletnyy analiz i ego prilozheniya [Continuous wavelet analysis and its applications]. Moscow, Fizmatlit Publ., 2003. 176 p.
  28. Dobeshi I. Bursts and other methods of localization in phase space. Mezhdunarodnyy kongress matematikov v Tsyurikhe. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1999, pp. 84–108.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies